Issue34

V. Oborin et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 34 (2015) 422-426; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.47 425   1/2 2 ( ( ) ( )) H x K r z x r z x r     , (6) where K(r) is the averaged difference between the values of surface relief heights z(x+r) and z(x) in the window of size r , and H is the Hurst exponent (surface roughness index). Representation of the function K(r) in logarithmic coordinates allowed one to evaluate the lower boundary of the scaling range l sc , and the value of upper boundary considering one as the characteristic scale of the process zone L pz , i.e. the area of correlated behavior of multiscale defect structures (Fig.3). (a) (b) Figure 2: Characteristic surface relief of a fatigue fracture zone: high cycle fatigue (a) ; gigacycle fatigue (b) . (a) (b) Figure 3: Characteristic one-dimensional profiles for zone 1 (a) , plot lnK(r) vs. ln(r) for zone 1 (b) . The values of the Hurst exponent H and the scales L pz and l sc for different loading conditions are given in Tab. 1. C ONCLUSION he comparative analysis of the scaling characteristics of samples loaded under conditions of high - and gigacycle fatigue shows a significant decrease in the range of spatial scales, where the Hurst exponent remains constant for dynamically loaded samples in the «fish-eye» (0.5-10.9 mkm) zone. This result confirms our assumption that mentioned characteristic scales L pz and l sc play an important role in the list of variables for the kinetic equation fatigue of T