Issue34

K. Nambu et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 34 (2015) 271-279: DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.29 273 anneal which removes the work-hardening region formed near the crack tip. However, in this research, because it was surface modification material, the vacuum anneal after crack generating was not performed. Electro-hydraulic servo fatigue testing machine was used to test. The loading-capacity fixed experiment was done for QT and VC material under the conditions of maximum load P max=4000 - 7000N. Moreover, the ΔK fixed experiment was done under the conditions of ΔK=18~36 MPa√m. The experiment was done by the stress ratio R= 0.1 and the sine wave with a frequency of f= 20 Hz. In addition, the crack measurements of length was performed by 100 times using the portable optical microscope. Moreover, the measurement of crack opening stress was called for from the relationship between a loading capacity and a strain using the strain gauges. Figure 2: Heat pattern of carburizing R ESIDUAL STRESS , RESIDUAL AUSTENITE AND HARDNESS MEASUREMENT METHOD he residual stress and the amount of retained austenites in the depth-of-cut direction were measured using the PSPC/MSF system. Each measurement condition is shown in Tab. 2 and 3. The hardness measurement was performed by the loading capacity of 2.94N using the micro Vickers measuring machine. Measurement principle Counter method Characteristic X-ray Cr-Kα Diffraction 211 Diffraction angle (deg) 156.4 Stress constant K(MPa/deg) -318 Slit diameter (mm) 4 Tube voltage (kV) 30 Tube current(mA) 20 Incident angle (deg) 5, 25, 35, 45 Analysis method Half width method Diffraction α-phase:(211) γ-phase:(220) Diffraction angle (deg) α-phase:156.4 γ-phase:128.4 Table 2: X-ray conditions for residual stress measurement. Table 3: X-ray conditions for retained austenite measurements. R ESIDUAL STRESS , RESIDUAL AUSTENITE AND HARDNESS MEASUREMENT RESULT he amount of retained austenites of the depth-of-cut direction of each processing material is shown in Fig. 3. As shown in a figure, as compared with QT material, the retained austenite of VC material is increasing greatly. This is considered to be what is depended on austenite having been stabilized when the Ms-point temperatures fell with the Increase of value in the amount of carbon by vacuum carburizing. Residual stress distribution of the depth-of-cut direction in each processing material is shown in Fig. 4. As shown in a figure, VC material is about -100 MPa almost uniformly to 100 micrometers. T T