Issue 53

S. Kirin et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 345-352; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.27 350 Now, for a/t=0.25 one can calculate K I =2837 MPa  mm for p=9.02 MPa and 3777 MPa  mm for p=12.05 MPa, whereas for a/t=0.5 K I =4012 MPa  mm for p=9.02 MPa and 5341 MPa  mm for p=12.05 MPa. Finally, assessment points coordinates in FAD are, Fig. 4: For ¼ crack, p=9.02 (0.54, 0.33), p=12.05 (0.54, 0.46). Corresponding probablities are 0.58 and 0.62. For ½ crack, p=9.02 (0.72, 0.44), p=12.05 (0.72, 0.62). Corresponding probablities are 0.75 and 0.82. Figure 4: Failure Assessment Diagram, including assessment points for surface cracks Now, one can get risk matrix in usual way, as presented in Tab. 2, indicating shift from high (0.58) to very high risk (0.62), for 1/4 crack, or from very high (0.75) to extremely high risk (0.82) for 1/2 crack. Consequence category 1 – very low 2 - low 3 - medium 4 - high 5 - very high Risk legend Probablity category ≤ 0.2 very low Very low 0.2-0.4 low Low 0.4-0.6 medium 1/4 crack p=9.02 MPa Medium 0.6-0.8 high 1/4 crack p=12.05 MPa 1/2 crack p=9.02 MPa High 0.8-1.0 very high 1/2 crack p=12.05 MPa Very High Table 2: Risk matrix for ¼ crack and ½ crack, p=9.02 MPa and 12.05 MPa. D ISCUSSION he approach so far presented is the simplest one which takes into account crack geometry and material behaviour. Being the simplest it is not the most accurate one, lacking precise stress distribution, especially in weld joint zones. Namely, as shown previously, [1,2], stress concentration can cause local plastic deformation in welded joints made by SAW, in the case of overpressure, since they have the lowest YS (687 MPa). To take into account such effects, more sophisticated approach is needed, e.g. Japp vs. J-R curve analysis, based on more complex analytical solutions for J, [1,2]. Here, such an analysis is briefly presented, as shown in Fig. 5. Corresponding critical values (0.91·YS for WM and 0.92·YS for BM in the case of ¼ crack, or 0.82·YS for WM and 0.85·YS for BM in the case of ½ crack, can be taken as inverse of T