Issue 53

R. Harbaoui et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 295-305; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.23 302 Figure 6: Identified tensile hardening curve with Ludwick law for TD Validation of the compression curve in the normal direction (ND) using the values identified by fixing the coefficient n of the tensile test: Ludwick ND Ludwick n= n00 Error 0.0167 0.0284 σ 0 -422.981 217.7096 K 940.3702 428.4957 Table 8: Hardening parameters for Ludwick law for fixed n=0.3925 Figure 7: Identified compression hardening curve with Ludwick law for ND Our identification strategy allows us to identify the experimental hardening curve along the two directions TD and ND using the identified parameters of the ludwick law according to the rolling direction RD. Identification of the anisotropic coefficients of the plasticity model: The second identification step consists in identifying the anisotropic parameters describing the CPB06 criterion using the identified hardening parameters of the Ludwick law that is chosen previously. While respecting the initial hypotheses identifying our meta-model, we identify the anisotropy coefficients and the material parameter k which will be represented in the table 9. Using the non quadratic CPB06 criterion, the previous identification is followed by an identification of the anisotropy coefficients of the forth order tensor C and the material parameter k, for a fixed degree of homogeneity (shape coefficient m =2) C 44 =C 55 =C 66 =1.