Issue 52

M.F. Bouali et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 52 (2020) 82-97; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.07 90 27.991 23.684 21.724 22.742 19.195 17.373 21.411 17.633 15.847 25.135 21.045 18.845 26.434 22.497 20.285 26.434 22.123 19.727 23.396 19.776 17.858 23.426 19.057 16.837 M10 4/10 430 A 35.397 30.220 26.033 22.296 20.082 35.397 25.099 20.162 16.680 14.904 35.397 23.460 17.394 13.683 12.055 35.397 29.096 23.825 19.351 16.977 35.397 30.180 25.451 21.146 18.742 35.397 30.541 25.451 20.687 18.063 35.397 26.427 21.564 17.748 15.746 35.397 27.229 20.946 16.112 13.766 M10 4/10 520 S 35.397 32.783 27.998 24.340 22.024 35.397 27.261 22.459 18.906 17.085 35.397 26.510 21.007 17.218 15.439 35.397 29.775 24.980 20.843 18.621 35.397 30.654 26.316 22.334 20.098 35.397 30.954 26.316 21.950 19.527 35.397 27.743 23.183 19.536 17.606 35.397 28.634 23.163 18.737 16.498 M10 4/10 750 S 35.397 34.123 33.845 32.945 33.002 35.397 32.858 30.576 28.491 27.317 35.397 32.847 30.546 28.449 27.273 35.397 33.001 30.762 28.665 27.469 35.397 33.176 31.047 29.002 27.815 35.397 33.244 31.047 28.912 27.677 35.397 32.695 30.437 28.398 27.249 35.397 32.938 30.651 28.522 27.316 Table 7: Modulus of elasticity of LWAC predicted by various composite models compared with the experimental results of Ke Y et al.  9  (GPa). Figure 2: Confrontation of LWAC Young’s modulus between experimental results in  7  and the predictions of 07 composite material models. Figure 3: Confrontation of LWAC Young’s modulus between experimental results in  8  and the predictions of 07 composite material models. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 5 10 15 20 25 30 E c_anal (GPa) E exp_De Larrard (GPa) Ec_Hashin Ec_Popovics Ec_Hirsch Ec_Bache Ec_Counto2 Ec_Maxwell Ec_Counto1 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 E c_anal (GPa) E exp_Yang (GPa) Ec_Hashin Ec_Popovics Ec_Hirsch Ec_Bache Ec_Counto2 Ec_Maxwell Ec_Counto1