Issue 51
D. Vasconcelos et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 51 (2020) 24-44; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.03 36 M1: 45.3 MPa N1: 336.7 MPa O1: 389.5 MPa P1: 450.4 MPa Q1: 327 MPa R1: 716.7 MPa Fig. 12 confirms that the higher stresses are located at the bottom of the MC column. The highlighted points have the following magnitudes: S1: 14 061 MPa T1: 565.26 MPa U1: 2 373 MPa V1: 376.87 MPa W1: 4 141 MPa Final Platform As the original DeepCWind structure proved to be unable to cope with the applied stresses, a structural improvement was performed and is suggested here. This reinforcement consisted of using structural reinforcements, as well as adjusting the members’ thicknesses. L1 N1 M1 01 R1 P1 Q1 Figure 11 : Submodels, using the Springs Formulation. At the left, the top of the MC column. At the right, the top of the UC. S1 T1 V1 W1 U1 Figure 12 : Submodel, using the Springs Formulation, of the bottom of the MC column.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=