Issue 51
A. Gesualdo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 51 (2020) 376-385; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.27 378 N D : boundary of the body and N D , N D : free and constrained boundary of the body . Given the body forces b in , the tractions p on N and the displacements u on D , the solution of the boundary value problem is the triplet { , } u λ b (displacement, anelastic strain, stress) fulfilling the following relations: equilibrium and static boundary conditions , , on N div T b 0 Tn p (1) kinematic boundary conditions , on D u u (2) stress-strain law and constitutive restrictions on strain involving fractures [ ] , tr 0 , det 0 T e λ T T (3) normality law tr 0 , det 0 , 0 λ λ T λ (4) where e is the infinitesimal strain and is the elastic tensor. The inequalities (3) lead to the following partition of the domain : 1 2 3 { : tr 0 , det 0} { : tr 0 , det 0} { : tr 0 , det 0}. x T T x T T x T T (5) The domain 1 is that of biaxial compression and the material has the classical bilateral elastic behaviour. In the domain 2 the material is in uniaxial compression and can show fractures. In this case the compressive lines when b 0 are straight lines. In the 3 domain the material is completely inert and any positive semidefinite fracture field is possible. Variational formulation It has been proved [23] the existence of a strain energy density for NT materials, so that a variational formulation of the problem can be derived, i.e. an equilibrium configuration corresponds to a minimum of the total Potential Energy: 1 ( ) . 2 N p ds u E E p u E (6) The equilibrium displacement solution may not be unique, due to the presence of the anelastic part. A dual formulation of the problem has been derived by [22], with the stress field 0 T as statically admissible solution minimizing the Complementary Energy functional: 1 1 ( ) . 2 D c ds T T T Tn u E (7) defined over the convex set of statically admissible stress fields.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=