Issue 50

F. Jafari et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 209-230; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.18 228 The result shows that total displacement (U), acceleration as well as RSM value decrease with increment of Young’s modules.  Compared to building with brick panel, by increasing Young's modulus in sample (3), the total displacement (U) of the concrete panel (point 2) decrease by 0.33 and RSM ratio     3 4 RSM sample RSM sample         decrease by 0.71 . Moreover, as compared to sample 2, the overall displacement decreases by 0.92 and RSM decrease by 0.93. The total acceleration (A t ) decrease by 56 % and RSM by 0.33 and these modules affects the reduction level of cyclic area, such that the area reduction is lower than 20% when using sample (3) as compared to the brick material wall. In addition, as compared to sample 2, the overall acceleration decreases by 86% and RSM decreases by 0.73, however, the maximum accelerations ratio      3  1 Acmax sample Acmax sample         is 0.82 and RSM ratio is 1.17. According to all above mentioned result, sample (3) has the best performance because it has the lowest displacement and acceleration under earth quake load.  Compared to building with brick panel, with using sample 3, the total displacement (U) of the steel frame in the building (point 3) decreases by 67% and RSM decrease by 57%. The total acceleration (A t ) decrease by 0.21and RSM by 0.15. In addition, as compared to other case (sample 2), the overall displacement decreases by 0.97 and RSM decreases by 0.85. Moreover, the overall acceleration ratio     3 2 Acmax sample ACmax sample         is 0.85 and RSM ratio is 0.88 .  Compared to sample 4, the maximum of displacement (U) of the insulting layers (point 5) decrease by 0.58 and RSM decreases by 0.81 in sample 3., the total acceleration (A t ) decrease by 0.78 while RSM increases by 0.61. Moreover, compared to sample 2, the ratio of maximum displacement     Umax sample3 Umax sample2         is 0.84 and RSM ratio is 0.84.  The displacement of concrete panel increase in the right frame, the ratio of RSM displacement URSM Left side  URSM Right side       for displacement is 1.06 for sample 3, while this value is 1.20 for sample 2, 0 for sample1 and 1.06 for brick material .The same ratio for steel part is 1.03 for sample 3, 1.04 for sample and sample1, and 1.30 for brick material  The acceleration of concrete panel increase in the right frame, the ratio of RSM Left side  Right side       for acceleration is 1.08 for sample 3, while this value is 1.223 for sample 2, 0 for sample1 and 1.06 for brick material .The same ratio for steel part is 1.32 for sample 3, 0.78 for sample and sample1, and 74% for brick material.  Neural network method was employed in this study final step; this research purpose was to evaluate the capability of using ANFIS for estimating the displacement and acceleration magnitude. Using ABAQUS in order to analyze the concrete solid material is considered as a time consuming method, due to the fact that concrete panels were model with concrete damage plasticity technique. In this study, the analysis of each model was completed by passing 48 hours. It is clear that using super computer can reduce this time, but this computer accessibility is not easy for all engineering. This study results indicates that the ANFIS is able to predict the FEM results, and also the displacement and acceleration magnitude, which were obtained with ANFIS models and were close to FEM result. Hence, applying ANFIS can help engineering to attain the building performance under the earthquake condition without the use of laboratory test or FEM software. C ONCLUSION andwich panels have been widely used in the building construction industry. Improving the sandwich panel behaviors is studied in different researches and different analysis methods are considered. Using additives to improve the shotcrete concrete and concrete has been the subject of various studies. The literature on improving the panel behavior shows that using Silica in concrete is possible and easy to execute. Improving the compressive, tensile, and bending resistance of concrete has been extensively studied, but there is no research available on enhancing the lateral resistance in S