Issue 50

F. Jafari et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 209-230; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.18 214 regulations express this effect by the Young's modulus, as a function of concrete density [19-21]. With an identified aggregate type, typically the direct relationship has been observed between the compressive strength and elastic modulus. Consequently, the Young's modulus confirms the general conclusions drawn above on the curing conditions, water/cement ratio, and etc. influence on the compressive strength. Young's modulus, compressive strength, and stress-strain curve for conventional concrete in every age can be calculated based on compressive strength with different equations, which has been mentioned in the following references [21-23]. Some researcher use experimental test to evaluate the strength of shotcrete for example: John Wolsiefer, pointing to the fact that for the first time Silica was used in the nineteenth century in Norway, investigated different methods of adding Silica to concrete and obtained compressive strength [2]. Different Silica products are added to concrete in this research. Rezayifar used two types of concrete for making concrete sandwich building; these concretes were prepared with Portland cement (II), and W/C is assumed 0.45 for all the samples. Compressive tests were done for standard cubes samples and shotcrete cores used based on ACI and ASTM specifications. The concrete specifications used in Rezayifar research are close to those of Velsfir samples. In fact, Velsfir considered shotcrete compressive strength ranging from 15 MPa to 60 MPa and the relationship between the compressive strength of the concrete and the Young's modulus is reported in the laboratory references [2]. In the present study, for the first and third samples, the concrete specimens constructed by Rezayifar were used, and the Young's modulus and compressive strength for the concrete layer were considered the same as Rezayifar’s research. Because the purpose of this study is to consider a wide range of concrete Young's modulus, the authors tried for the third sample to get help from the high values referred to by Velsfir. After determining the compressive strength, using the three experimental references, and suggesting the relationship between the compressive strength, the Young's modulus was estimated for sample three. Thus, it was tried that an acceptable wide range in the recommended values of laboratory references is selected for the concrete layer so that the upper and lower limits of the Young's modulus could be included. Due to this purpose, each of these references suggested an equation to obtain the relationship between ௖ and E [21-25]. In this paper, all proposed equations in the experimental references were used to obtain the value of ௖ and then their average was extracted. Finally, the approximate Young's modulus has been reported based on the work of John Wolsiefer and Rezayifar. The values are presented in Tab. 1. Concrete Samples Elastic module (GPa) Poisson ratio Dimension (m) Density (kg/m 3 ) Compressive Strength (MPa) Tensile Strength (MPa) Sample1 (24 hours) [8-2]. 15 0.3 4.2*3.6*0.1 2300 28.6 2.8 Sample 2(Middle) [8-2]. 24 0.3 4.2*3.6*0.1 2300 32.1 3 Sample 3(63 days) [2]. 30 0.3 4.2*3.6*0.1 2300 63 4.7 Steel (wire and Frame) Type Elastic module (GPa) Poisson ratio Dimension (m) Density (kg/m 3 ) Yield stress (MPa) Steel Wire [8]. 200 0.3 ∅ ଶ଴ 7870 470 Frame (Solid) [8]. 200 0.3 ---- 7870 470 Insulating layer Type Elastic module (GPa) Poisson ratio Dimension (m) Density (kg/m 3 ) Compressive Strength (MPa) shear Strength (MPa) (Solid) [26-27]. 0.0030 0.41 4.2*3.6*0.2 32 0.172 0.152 Table 1 : Specifications of the modeled building components in the ABAQUS.