Issue 48

V. Giannella et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 639-647; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.61 641 The experimental crack paths for all the tests are shown in Figs. 3-4. It is worth noting that, for simplifying the comparison between numerical and experimental results, both static and cyclic loading directions are reported in Figs. 3-4, i.e. the static load is applied from the lower left to the upper right of the figure, whereas the cyclic load is applied from the upper left to the lower right. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 2 : (a) Drawings of the cruciform specimen (red square defining the portion considered for the numerical analyses) with (b) close- up of the initial notch; (c) specimen photo with (d) close-up of the initial notch. (Courtesy of Christian Kontermann, TU Darmstadt, Germany) Test [-] Load step [-] Static load magnitude [kN] Cyclic load [-] Amplitude [kN] Load ratio R [-] Frequency [Hz] I 1 24.0 8.0 -1 5 II 1 3.0 24.0 -1 5 2 12.0 Table 1 : Loading conditions for the tests. E [GPa] υ [-] C [mm/cycle/[(MPa mm^0.5)^ m ]] m [-] w [-] 120.4 0.32 4.83828E-13 3 0.67 Table 2 : Main mechanical properties and Walker law parameters of Ti6246.