Issue 48

A. Kurek et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 42-49; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.06 43 The analysis of the impact of various load conditions (tension-compression and cantilever pendulum bending) on a fatigue life is made in this study. This analysis is carried out based on the elastic-brittle material (aluminium 6082-T6) and the elastic-plastic material (steel 16Mo3). The impact of the load condition on a fatigue life and a fatigue breakthrough structure is compared. F ATIGUE TESTING OF STEEL AND ALUMINIUM he tests of two types of materials were subjected to analysis. The representative of the elastic-brittle material is aluminium alloy 6082-T6 and the representative of the elastic-plastic material is 16Mo3 steel used mostly in the power industry. The Tab. 1 presents the designation of these materials according to various standards. Material DIN ISO PN Werkstoff EN 6082 AlMgSi1 AlSi1MgMn PA4 3.2315 6082 16Mo3 15Mo3 16Mo3 16M 1.5415 16Mo3 Table 1 : Material designations according to various standards (equivalents) The chemical compositions are presented in Tab. 2, and the mechanical properties of the analyzed materials in the Tab. 3. The test results under the conditions of uniaxial tension-compression for respective materials: 6082-T6 [7-12] and 16Mo3 [13-15] are taken from the literature. The cyclic properties of the materials under analysis are presented in Tab. 4, where the tests under the cantilever bending conditions were carried out at the controlled moment amplitude for the aluminium alloy 6082-T6 and the controlled amplitude of total strain for both materials. These tests were performed at the MZGS- 100 test stands constructed by Achtelik which constitute the equipment of the Department of Mechanics and Machine Design at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering of the Opole University of Technology. The first test stand is presented in Fig. 1a. This test stand has already been repeatedly used for various experimental tests. Aluminium alloy 6082 (in %, Al balance) Cu Mg Mn Si Fe Zr+Ti Zn Cr <0.1 0.6÷1.2 0.4÷1.0 0.7÷1.3 <0.5 <0.1 <0.2 <0.25 Steel 16Mo3 (in %, Fe balance) C Mo Mn Si P S Ni Cr 0.18 0.325 0.55 0.29 0.019 0.010 0.04 0.06 Table 2 : Chemical compositions Material R p0,2 , MPa R m ,MPa A% ν 6082-T6 365 385.2 27.2 (A 12,5 ) 0.32 16Mo3 335 481 24 (A 5 ) 0.30 Table 3: Basic mechanical properties Material K’, MPa n’ E, GPa σ’ f , MPa ε’ f b c 6082-T6 526.1 0.0651 77 650.6 1.292 -0.078 -1.014 16Mo3 1038 0.133 210 780.4 0.223 -0.096 -0.047 Table 4: Cyclic properties The second test stand (Fig. 1b) is a prototype test stand. “Diabolo” type samples were used in testing, the shape and dimensions of which are presented in Fig. 2. The tests in this case were carried out at the controlled lever inclination which is reflected (after rescaling) directly in the controlled amplitude of the total strain (ε at ). A bending moment amplitude was also registered in the course of testing. As fatigue life (N exp ) it was assumed that corresponding to a moment at which an inclination amplitude in the first case was increasing abruptly or in the other case, when the moment amplitude (M a ) was dropping rapidly (by 15%), what was T