Issue 48

T. Profant et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 503-512; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.48 508 where ˆ ˆ cos sin , sin cos . X Y X X Y Y b b b b b b q q q q = + =- + (23) Figure 3 : The stress tensor component xx T of the fundamental solution ( ) * , ; x T x h compared with the FEM solution along the positive x - axis for the unit point force 1 f f h = = situated at the point [ ] , x h . Figure 4 : The stress tensor components xy T of the fundamental solution ( ) * , ; x T x h compared with the FEM solution along the positive x - axis for the unit point force 1 f f h = = situated at the point [ ] , x h . Figure 5 : The stress tensor components yy T of the fundamental solution ( ) * , ; x T x h compared with the FEM solution along the positive x - axis for the unit point force 1 f f h = = situated at the point [ ] , x h . Figure 6 : The energy release rate G e as a function of the crack inclination q and the outer stress 1 T when 0 a =  .