Issue 48

J.P.S.M.B. Ribeiro et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 332-347; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.32 344 ductility. On the other hand, the slight deviations between the experiments and simulations were found to due to using a triangular CZM to model a highly ductile adhesive [35]. a) b) Figure 11 : Comparison between experimental and numerical P m values for the SLJ (a) and DLJ (b) bonded with the Araldite® AV138, considering different  . a) b) Figure 12 : Comparison between experimental and numerical P m values for the SLJ (a) and DLJ (b) bonded with the Araldite® 2015, considering different  . a) b) Figure 13 : Comparison between experimental and numerical P m values for the SLJ (a) and DLJ (b) bonded with the Sikaforce® 7752, considering different  . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] AV138 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] AV138 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] 2015 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] 2015 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] 7752 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 P m [kN] L O [mm] 7752 Exp 0.5 1 1.5 2