Issue 45

D. Yang et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 45 (2018) 45-52; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.45.04 50 Joints w0/t1 w1/t1 Brace-side SCF Chord-side SCF 0° 135° 180° 135° 180° WT 1 0.5 1.2 2.19 1.75 1.82 2.54 2.68 WT 2 0.5 2.0 1.78 1.23 1.18 2.59 2.72 WT 3 1.2 1.2 2.35 1.96 2.05 2.27 2.35 WT 4 1.8 1.8 2.25 1.77 1.83 2.08 2.11 WT 5 0.5 1.8 1.88 1.34 1.33 2.60 2.83 WT 6 1.0 1.8 2.13 1.63 1.64 2.41 2.47 Table 2: SCF in Condition 2. (a) effect of only size change of brace-side weld. (b) effect of equal proportionally change of weld size (c) effect of only size change of chord-side weld Figure. 9 : Effects of weld size on the SCF. First, the weld size directly affected the hot spot stress in both conditions, and the influence laws were largely the same. Second, the chord-side weld size was all 0.5t1, while the brace-side weld size was 1.2t1, 1.8t1 and 2.0t1, respectively, in WT1, WT5 and WT2. In both conditions, the brace-side SCF plunged with the increase of brace-side weld size, while the chord-side SCF changed slightly less than 5%. Fig. 9(a) illustrates the effect of weld size on the SCF in Condition 1. The effect of weld size in Condition 2 was similar to that in Condition 1. This is because the increase in brace-side weld size pushed the brace-side extrapolation region away from the stress hotspot, leading to reduced hot spot stress obtained by extrapolation. Third, the weld size in WT3 was 1.2t1 at both brace-side and chord-side, and that in WT4 was 1.8t1 at both brace-side and chord-side. In both conditions, the SCF in WT3 surpassed that in WT4 at both brace-side and chord-side. Fig. 9(b) depicts the effect of fillet weld size on the SCF in Condition 1. The effect of fillet weld size in Condition 2 was similar to