Issue 30

S. Baragetti et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 30 (2014) 84-94; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.12 85 and methanol-HCl solutions. The authors observed a 30 hours fracture time for pure methanol, and a 0.3÷0.6 hours for the methanol-HCl combination. In this latter case however, water addition easily passivated the reaction. Some critical service failures were observed in the Apollo rocket Ti-6Al-4V tanks, filled with N 2 O 4 and methanol, promoting several tests in different aggressive environments to investigate on the susceptibility of this alloy. The results, found by NASA investigations presented in the works of Johnston et al. [7], and Johnson et al. [8] for static and fatigue loading of methanol filled pressurized tanks, show a high sensitivity from the methanol environment in both loading cases, as can be seen in Tab. 1. Brown [9] has collected a wide review of most of the work conducted in the late 60’s on SCC of Titanium alloys and high strength steels, proposing similar conclusions. Apart from the work from NASA [7,8], which reports a direct correlation between load and the aggressive methanol environment, the other literature results [5, 6, 9, 10] are based only on static or U-bend corrosion tests, reported in terms of hours to failure, thus avoiding a direct correlation between the applied load and the corrosive environment. An example of this kind of results in a methanol-water-HCl mixture is reported in Fig. 1, from [10]. Test type Static Fatigue Environment Load [MPa] Time to failure [min] Load [MPa] Cycles to failure Air 827 >4463 (no failure) 48-965 1385 Methanol 17 86 Table 1 : Comparison between Ti-6Al-4V specimens in air and methanol environment, for static and fatigue loading, from [7] Figure 1 : Time to failure for U-bend Ti-6Al-4V specimens in X wt.% Methanol – 0.17 wt.% HCl – Y wt. % Water, from [10]. It is hence mandatory to investigate further into the mechanisms which reduce the material strength in corrosive environments, since it is well known from literature that the high corrosion resistance of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy is linked to the quick oxidation of its surface, protecting the base material from the interaction with the external environment [3,4,6]. The mechanical loading, both in the tensile and fatigue cases, may compromise the effectiveness of the external oxidation passivating layer, depending also on the dynamics of the applied load, as reported in [3]. In [6], a removal of the oxide layer, both in the proximity of SCC cracks and in other regions not stress interested, was observed in the methanol-HCl solution. A study of the mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V in aggressive environments, both under quasi-static and fatigue loading is hence essential to understand the possible insurgence of SCC or corrosion fatigue behavior for this material, due to the effects that various loading conditions can impose on the alloy oxide based protection system. In the last years, the Authors research group has conducted several studies on the corrosion fatigue performances of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy in air and sea water (3.5 % wt. NaCl) [11] and on the corrosion fatigue in methanol environment at different concentrations [12]. In the present work, the most relevant results obtained by these campaigns are discussed, highlighting the effect of