Issue 30

G. Zucca et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 30 (2014) 409-416; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.49 413 Figure 12 : Actuator Case internal diameter measurements. Figure 13 : Cap external diameter measurements. Results are showed in Tab. 1. The two parts have an average mechanical interference of 25 µm. This was the reason of the tight fit observed during disassembly operations between external case and cap. Mean Diameter [mm] Mean Coupling [mm] Cap 50.8843±0.1498 -0.025 Actuator case 50.8587±0.0565 Table 1 : Results of measurement. Design drawing values are: Diameter of Actuator Case 2.000 – 2.002 inches (50.8000 - 50.8508 mm) Diameter of Cap 1.998 – 1.999 inches (50.7492 - 50.7746 mm) Table 2 : Drawing requirements. Therefore, the required gap should be comprised between 25.4 to 101.6 µm. Microstructural analysis. A Microstructural examination, were performed on two sections of actuator case made orthogonally and parallel to its axis. The examination, revealed the joint zone between the two halves of the actuator case, showing two different microstructures [4]. Transition is showed in Fig. 14. Hardness test will evaluate mechanical consequences of this anomaly. Another section, near the oil chamfer was analyzed, in order to evaluate the shot peening treatment required by design. Chemical analisys and conductivity test. X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) showed that the actuator case samples were in accordance with the specification for a 7049 [5] [6] aluminum alloy. Alloy homogeneity was confirmed by EDS mapping on the outer edge of the actuator case.