Issue 30

B. Tyson et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 30 (2014) 95-100; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.13 95 Focussed on: Fracture and Structural Integrity related Issues Elastic compliance of single-edge-notched tension SE(T) (or SENT) specimens B. Tyson 1 CanmetMATERIALS, Hamilton, ON, Canada btyson@nrcan.gc.ca P. Ding, X. Wang Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada pingding@cmail.carleton.ca , xwang@mae.carleton.ca A BSTRACT . There has been a trend recently to use specimen geometries for toughness measurement that are more representative of actual flaw geometries in service. A prominent example is the use of single-edge-notched tension specimens for assessment of surface flaws in pipelines. To obtain a resistance (R) curve, i.e. J-integral or CTOD as a function of crack growth, it is necessary to monitor the crack size as a function of J or CTOD. To facilitate obtaining these data from a single specimen, the elastic CMOD unloading compliance C has been used in several testing programs to estimate crack size. C is a function of several variables in addition to crack size – notably, specimen constraint (plane stress or plane strain). In this paper, the dependence of C on these variables will be discussed. K EYWORDS . SENT; SE(T); Constraint; Compliance; R-curve. I NTRODUCTION : SE(T) TESTING haracterization of resistance to fracture of the materials used in construction of engineering structures such as pipelines is a vital step in design. Conventionally, this has been done by using a test that gives a conservative material property (the “fracture toughness”) that can be compared with the estimated maximum crack driving force of a plausible flaw in service, and ensuring that the material selected has adequate toughness to prevent fracture. This is a safe way to proceed, but because of the high degree of conservatism in some cases it can lead to uneconomic design. In particular, for thin-walled structures such as pipe, the lower degree of constraint experienced by surface flaws can enable the material to withstand much higher driving force than in a highly-constrained test specimen. The logical response to this is to reproduce the actual service geometry and loads as closely as possible in the toughness test set-up. The resistance displayed by the material in this arrangement may not be a lower bound for the material, i.e. it may be “geometry-dependent”, but it will be the appropriate toughness to use in assessing the defect tolerance of the structure being simulated. The procedure for engineering critical assessment of circumferential surface flaws (i.e. weld defects) in line pipe is a case in point. It is well known that the constraint for such flaws is substantially lower than the constraint in the standard three- point-bend test geometry. To generate toughness measurements more representative of the service conditions, tests with 1 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2014. C