Issue 15

Th Ma inte loa Mi To ima the sof Figure 6 : e stress field ximum stress rface are sh d steps consi crotomography observe the ging using a specimen a tware plug-in Material Stainless s UHMWP Bone cem Trabecula Loading forc distribution value equal own in Fig. 8 dered. imaging process of d custom µCT nd the detec . F teel E (ISO 5834 ent r bone Tabl e used in the s in the bone to 12.48 MP . The places amage in the device show tor were pr D. Kytyr e igure 5 : 10-no Youn -2) e 1 : Material p imulation. -cement inte a was reache of maximal acetabular re n in Fig. 9 ovided by st t alii, Frattura e de tetrahedral g’s modulus 220 0.69 2 0.850 roperties used F rface were o d at 20 % of value of von gion during was perform epper motor d Integrità Strut elements mes [GPa] in the FE mo igure 7 : Resul bserved to lo the gait cycle Mises stres the loading m ed. Manipula s using a U turale, 15 (201 h. Poisson’s 0.30 0.46 0.38 0.25 del. ting stress in t cate the reg . The stress s were in the icrofocus C tion with the SB interface 1) 5-13; DOI : 10 ratio he bone-ceme ions of pote fields on the acetabular l omputed To X-ray sourc , controlled .3221/IGF-ESIS. nt interface. ntial damage bone-cemen abrum for al mography (µ e, the table w by Pixelman 15.01 9 . t l CT) ith [8]