Issue 51

D. Vasconcelos et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 51 (2020) 24-44; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.51.03 25 I NTRODUCTION he recent move towards electrical transportation, the development of other economies, as well as the emergence of a digitalized world, will increase the need for electricity production. It is estimated that it could lead to a 90% rise in power demand from 2018 to 2040 [1]. On the other hand, the Paris Climate Agreement was signed. This agreement results from an international effort to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change and to intensify the actions that have to be taken for a sustainable low carbon future. The main goal of the agreement is to promote a sustainable development by keeping a global average temperature rise well below 2 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels, throughout this century. Furthermore, a limit of 1.5 degrees should be pursued [2]. For that reason, the use of renewable energy sources is of major importance. One of the most significant sources is the wind, which Mankind has been using for its needs for centuries. Nowadays, the sight of wind turbines on land is very common but the prospective trend is the emergence of offshore wind turbines. Although offshore wind capital costs are still higher than those of other renewable technologies, a decline has been registered since 2015 [3]. For Europe, offshore wind power may be a key player for further energy production capacity, as it has at its disposal a large marine space with strong wind potential [4]. At the end of 2018, Europe’s cumulative installed offshore wind capacity was 18 499 MW, with 2 649 MW being added to the grid in the referred year [5]. At offshore sites, the wind presents less turbulent conditions, due to the lack of obstacles, which is a major advantage for a steady electricity production. Another key advantage is the possibility of using bigger turbines and thus producing more power. The use of bigger turbines is more advantageous at sea due to eased transportation logistics, reduced land used and less visual/wildlife impacts [6]. However, offshore structures are subjected to severe dynamic loads due to wind, waves, currents and mechanical loads [7]. After going from onshore to offshore wind power, the next big step is going from bottom-fixed platforms into the floating type, which are for use in deep waters (more than 60 meters). This is a step which may lead to great benefits as most of the potential of the offshore wind resource is in waters with depths that are too deep for the installation of an economically competitive bottom-fixed foundation [8]. An example of a floating platform is the DeepCWind. The DeepCWind structure was developed by the DeepCWind consortium 1 as an initiative to support the research on floating offshore wind technologies [9]. It was used by the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4) as a way to generate test data for validation of offshore wind turbine modeling tools. The results of the experiment allow for a better understanding of offshore floating wind turbine dynamics and modeling techniques, as well as a better awareness of the validity of various approximations [10]. This structure is still under development and no real scale model has been produced. Nonetheless, a 1:50 scale model was used in 2013 for tank testing. The DeepCWind foundation was designed to support the NREL 5 MW Reference Wind Turbine [11]. To perform a structural analysis, the Finite Element Method (FEM) was used. The FEM is a numerical analysis technique that produces approximate solutions for engineering problems. It examines a domain of interest by discretizing it into an assembly of finite elements. Partial differential equations are then used to find an approximate solution, within each element, for how the structure behaves when subjected to certain loads or excitations [12]. The ANSYS software was used to perform the FEM analysis. With the purpose of verifying the suitability of an offshore structure, several design load cases (DLC) are made available. This document uses DLCs defined on a standard published by Germanischer Lloyd (GL) [13]. Different types of finite element analysis were performed and are presented in the following sections. It should me mentioned that the DeepCWind Program did not take any real part in defining or validating the structural integrity of the platform. As such, this paper credits no responsibility to them regarding the conclusions on structural integrity. METHODS Project Approach he approach of this project was divided in two stages. Initially, the original DeepCWind design was computationally evaluated at the DLC 1.1 conditions (briefly explained in later sections). Firstly, static structural analyses were performed at 11.4 m s -1 and it was verified that the structure was unable to cope with the applied stresses. Secondly, 1 The DeepCWind consortium is a group of universities, national labs and companies, which are funded by the USA Department of Energy. T T