Issue 42

H. Carvalho et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 42 (2017) 93-104; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.42.11 94 road, an electric railway and the city of Florianopolis water supply. The bridge is 819.5 m long and its length is composed of: 259 m of island overpass, 339.5 m of main span (Fig. 1) and 221.0 m of continent overpass. The main span makes the Hercilio Luz Bridge one of the largest in the world and one of the last possessing eye-bars incorporated to a truss. Figure 1 : Main span of the Hercílio Luz Bridge (339.5 meters long). Fig. 2 presents the main elements that compose the bridge. The steel structure has the approximated weight of five thousand tons. The foundations and pillars were built with 14.250 m³ of concrete. The metallic pylons are 75 m high above sea level and the main span is 32 m high above sea level. The main span is composed by a truss whose maximal height is reached at one quarter of the span, where the bending moment is maximal. In the truss central part, between one quarter and three quarters of the span, the eye-bars are incorporated to the truss, where they work as an upper chord. Outside the span’s central region, the truss upper chord is connected to the eye-bars through vertical hangers [17]. Visual inspections and non-destructive tests indicated the need for replacement of the eye-bars, eye-bar supports, pylon bases, hangers and some truss elements. To make the replacements possible, an auxiliary structure under the main span truss was conceived. This structure will temporarily hold the main span. The load transfer from the eye-bar to the auxiliary structure will be performed with a synchronized jacking sequence. The structure will be reassembled thought a reverse jacking sequence. Figure 2 : Main elements of the Hercilio Luz bridge. E VALUATED FOR ORIGINAL DESIGN OPTIONS he bridge original design was conceived in the 1920s by the American engineers H. D. Robinson and D. B. Steinman. The steel structure was manufactured in the United States and assembled in Brazil by the company American Bridge. Fig. 3 shows the three different structural solutions evaluated: a suspension bridge with incorporated eye-bars (the retained solution, judged as the most cost-effective solution at the time), a standard suspension bridge and a truss bridge. T