Issue 33
F. Castro et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 33 (2015) 444-450; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.33.49 445 Wöhler Curve Method (MWCM) [11] was applied at a point located at a critical distance below the trailing edge of the contact. Estimates of fretting fatigue thresholds fell within an error interval of ±20% when compared to experimental data. The methodology proposed by Araújo et al. [6] is only applicable to design situations involving threshold conditions. In this paper, an extension of this approach to the medium-cycle fatigue regime is presented. A first attempt to assess the new methodology is carried out based on available fretting fatigue tests [1]. M ULTIAXIAL FATIGUE LIFE ESTIMATION he MWCM [10-12] is a multiaxial stress-based critical plane approach where the driving parameters for crack nucleation are the maximum shear stress amplitude, a , and the maximum normal stress acting on the maximum shear stress plane, n,max . Once the values of a and n,max have been evaluated, the stress ratio is defined as n,max a (1) It is noteworthy that is sensitive not only to mean stresses, but also to the degree of multiaxiality and non- proportionality of the stress path [10]. Also, it is worth recalling that for an unnotched specimen under fully reversed uniaxial loading the ratio is equal to unity, whereas under fully reversed torsional loading equals zero [10]. The MWCM is based on a modified Wöhler diagram where a is plotted against the number of cycles to failure, N f (Fig. 1). This diagram is made of different fatigue curves, each one corresponding to a certain value of ratio and being unambiguously described by its negative inverse slope and by a reference shear stress amplitude, A,Ref , corresponding to an appropriate number of cycles to failure, N A . To obtain the diagram, one should properly define the vs. and A,Ref vs. relationships, and correctly calibrate them by running appropriate experiments. The following linear relationships have been found by Lazzarin and Susmel [12] to correlate a wide range of experimental data: ( ) b a (2) A,Ref ( ) c d (3) where a , b , c and d are material constants. When these constants are obtained from fully-reversed uniaxial and torsional tests on plain specimens, Eqs. (2) and (3) are stated as Figure 1 : Modified Wöhler diagram. ( ) [ ( ) ( 1 0)] ( )0 (4) 0 A,Ref 0 0 ( ) 2 (5) where ( =1) and 0 are, respectively, the inverse slope of the modified Wöhler curve and the fatigue limit under uniaxial loading condition, whereas ( =0) and 0 are the corresponding quantities for torsional loading. It is noteworthy that, for T
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=